Who really is the expert?
I have worked in this field for so many years and yet each Facebook group postings I read and whenever I talk with PWP I realise that no matter how much we go on about changes and expert patient and patient empowerment t simply doesn’t happen expert in very few cases. I recently came across and group called the non motor symptom group who were trying to develop a nonmotor symptom questionnaire for the assessment of their symptoms. In reality the tool had been developed about 15 years ago by Prof Ray Chaudhuri and his team at KCH London. The tool had been translated into many languages and has been based on research and evidence based practice. Yet this group of people from all over the world were and still are in some cases unaware of the tool existence. Is this because unless you are under a Movement disorder centre in London or around the world that the information is not shared? is it because the clinical experts do not share the information with those who matter most? and that being the person living with the Parkinsons? .
From years of working in this field I learnt very quickly that although I can assess a PWP physically I can never feel their on and off periods. Their painful dystonia or their pain in general? . I can see them going off in clinic or coming “On” but I cant feel that sensation. I cant read their day and their symptoms. Surely then the expert must be the person living with the Parkinsons and their families?. But although they are the ones experiencing their symptoms how can they assess their symptoms or name their symptoms if no one has ever named them or explained them from diagnosis. Many PWP and their carers and families learn very little about what they are living with as their clinics are often ” how are you? ” I am fine that’s good see you in 3 months or 6 months. But where is the education?
It is assumed that the PWP can look their symptoms up. But how can they look up what they don’t understand? and when their symptoms don’t have a name? . In many other conditions such as diabetes and cancer information is given out from the diagnosis. It is compulsory for newly diagnosed people with diagnosis are encouraged to join the expert patient training. In Cancer the diagnosis is given followed by explanations and care planning and treatments are discussed. When is DBS Apomorphine and Duodopa discussed in Parkinsons? do the PWP get the options of medications or are they just given a prescription and told to take the treatment? How many are offered reviews by the Multi Disciplinary team such as Physiotherapy Speech and language therapy ? How many understand the role of the MDT and why they are being referred to them? If they don’t understand that speech and swallowing are often part of the symptoms of Parkinsons how would they be expected to understand the reason for the referral? so why would they attend the appointment ?
Why are the professionals reluctant to pass their expertise on to the PWP at diagnosis? is it the lack of time? is it the fear of giving too much information too soon? when in reality the PWP is out there often alone searching out of fear to start to understand the diagnosis of the incurable movement disorder that has just landed in their lap? there are no care plans no patient pathways to follows and often just twice yearly clinic reviews for a total of 30 minutes.
However change can only come form the patients groups and the PWP themselves. I have attended many conferences over the years and many expert nurse classes but in reality have seen very few changes in the diagnosis procedures or the way diagnosis and follow ups are handled. Until we have patient lead clinics and research will things ever change? will the QOL of the PWP and their families improve? or will the experts remain being the clinician who is some cases are less experienced and less expert in Parkinsons than the person they are treating ?